'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever

Moderator: eek

User avatar
Muddling Through
Posts: 11876
Joined: August 29th, 2020, 5:11 pm
Has thanked: 4634 times
Been thanked: 3340 times

'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever

Unread post by Muddling Through »

Good news.

"Three days after Washington became the 10th state to enact an "assault weapon" ban, a federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a similar law in Illinois. That decision, which was published last Friday, may signal the demise of a long-running public policy fraud that falsely depicts an arbitrarily defined category of semi-automatic rifles as good for nothing but mass murder.

"Assault weapon" bans, which typically cover specific models along with features such as adjustable stocks, pistol grips, flash suppressors, and barrel shrouds, have always been logically dubious. And under the constitutional test that the Supreme Court recently established, they look more legally vulnerable than ever."

https://reason.com/2023/05/03/assault-w ... than-ever/
User avatar
FOIA
Posts: 12515
Joined: August 29th, 2020, 8:49 pm
Has thanked: 1106 times
Been thanked: 3135 times

Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever

Unread post by FOIA »

It's extremely important to keep so-called "assault weapons" out of the hands of law-abiding citizens.
Baron
Posts: 2794
Joined: August 3rd, 2021, 4:41 pm
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 634 times

Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever

Unread post by Baron »

FOIA wrote: May 4th, 2023, 6:41 pm It's extremely important to keep so-called "assault weapons" out of the hands of law-abiding citizens.
FOIA,

I have three, but I haven't killed anyone this week. (Of course it's only Monday.)

Regards,
Baron
User avatar
Charlie Mike
Posts: 27787
Joined: May 8th, 2021, 6:14 am
Has thanked: 1869 times
Been thanked: 5788 times

Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever

Unread post by Charlie Mike »

FOIA wrote: May 4th, 2023, 6:41 pm It's extremely important to keep so-called "assault weapons" out of the hands of law-abiding citizens.
Only the government is entitled to possess weapons "only suitable for killing large number of people at once."
CrazyD
Posts: 1861
Joined: August 30th, 2020, 7:44 am
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 579 times

Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever

Unread post by CrazyD »

Baron wrote: May 8th, 2023, 2:55 pm FOIA,

I have three, but I haven't killed anyone this week. (Of course it's only Monday.)

Regards,
Baron
Rookie numbers :D

Right now I have 8 AR15's (did own 12 but recent job loss forced me to sell 4), 10 M1 Carbines and 1 9mm Berreta 9mm carbine that the left would ban in a heartbeat if they could
Baron
Posts: 2794
Joined: August 3rd, 2021, 4:41 pm
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 634 times

Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever

Unread post by Baron »

CrazyD wrote: May 14th, 2023, 4:40 pm Rookie numbers
CrazyD,

I am suitably impressed.
Get me to my fainting couch.

Regards,
Baron
CrazyD
Posts: 1861
Joined: August 30th, 2020, 7:44 am
Has thanked: 96 times
Been thanked: 579 times

Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever

Unread post by CrazyD »

Baron wrote: May 14th, 2023, 7:35 pm CrazyD,

I am suitably impressed.
Get me to my fainting couch.

Regards,
Baron
I was building Ar's for awhile.
Post Reply