Good news.
"Three days after Washington became the 10th state to enact an "assault weapon" ban, a federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a similar law in Illinois. That decision, which was published last Friday, may signal the demise of a long-running public policy fraud that falsely depicts an arbitrarily defined category of semi-automatic rifles as good for nothing but mass murder.
"Assault weapon" bans, which typically cover specific models along with features such as adjustable stocks, pistol grips, flash suppressors, and barrel shrouds, have always been logically dubious. And under the constitutional test that the Supreme Court recently established, they look more legally vulnerable than ever."
https://reason.com/2023/05/03/assault-w ... than-ever/
'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever
Moderator: eek
-
Muddling Through
- Posts: 10887
- Joined: August 29th, 2020, 5:11 pm
- Has thanked: 3745 times
- Been thanked: 2944 times
-
FOIA
- Posts: 11256
- Joined: August 29th, 2020, 8:49 pm
- Has thanked: 947 times
- Been thanked: 2724 times
Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever
It's extremely important to keep so-called "assault weapons" out of the hands of law-abiding citizens.
Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever
FOIA,
I have three, but I haven't killed anyone this week. (Of course it's only Monday.)
Regards,
Baron
-
Charlie Mike
- Posts: 23744
- Joined: May 8th, 2021, 6:14 am
- Has thanked: 1679 times
- Been thanked: 4602 times
Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever
Only the government is entitled to possess weapons "only suitable for killing large number of people at once."
Re: 'Assault Weapon' Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever
Rookie numbers
Right now I have 8 AR15's (did own 12 but recent job loss forced me to sell 4), 10 M1 Carbines and 1 9mm Berreta 9mm carbine that the left would ban in a heartbeat if they could